Lots of inspiring speakers at today’s academic retreat. I had ten minutes to give my opinion on how to give a great talk, and referred to a few great books to help:
My opinion? Craft a powerful message and find the best tools at your disposal to convey it. Easy!
Bret Nelson and Felipe Teran took part in an incredible conference just outside of Stockholm, Sweden. Over one hundred participants and twenty faculty attended this sold-out conference at the Hasseludden Yasuragi Japanese spa . Among the luminaries were Matt Dawson and Mike Mallin (from the Ultrasound Podcast), lung ultrasound queen Vicki Noble, Mike Lambert and Joe Wood (directors of the first ultrasound program in the United States), and many, many others.
Videos from the conference are available here. Besides excellent lectures, there were hands-on sessions recorded. An incredible amount of practical information is conveyed during these hands-on sessions, so it is worth checking out some of these videos as well as the lectures. Bret Nelson’s session on aorta scanning is here,
Felipe Teran and Bret Nelson
Matt Dawson and Mike Mallin
Organizer Christofer Muhr welcomes participants
Participant getting a bit of light reading done on the flight to Stockholm
The Mount Sinai Department of Emergency Medicine hosted its annual ultrasound CME conference on April 25. Faculty, fellows, nurses and PAs from a number of institutions and specialties took part in our tenth annual course.
The course was directed by Bret Nelson, MD who introduced ultrasound physics and machine controls, followed by lectures on assessment of airway and breathing (Jim Tsung, MD, MPH), cardiovascular ultrasound (Jennifer Huang, DO), trauma evaluation (Phil Andrus, MD) and procedure guidance (Amy Sanghvi, MD).
After lunch an intensive hands-on session with live models, task simulators and sim cases rounded out the experience.
Spectacular rounds this week lead by Sahar Ahmad of Stonybrook and hosted by Pierre at BI.
Sahar gave a great presentation on her didactic program for the critical care fellows at Stonybrook. She then presented a series of discussion inducing cases. Carl Kaplan (of Stonybrook not RUSH) presented an interesting case of ONSD ultrasound for hydrocephalus. Sam Parnia gave a presentation on the cardiopulmonary resuscitation research being done at Stonybrook on cerebral oximetry.
Some of the articles (with pmid and link) that came up in discussion were:
- The Lung US Consensus Recommendations: 22392031
- Copetti ARDS vs Pulmonary Edema: 18442425
- NASA MRI Optic Nerve sheath: 22416248
- Louis Eisen Optic Nerve sheath: 21519957
- Flawed Pediatric Optic nerve sheath article 19167786
- re “reverse” FALLS protocol – Vicki Noble’s on bline resolution at dialysis 19188552
See you next time.
More lung ultrasound tips and examples from Drs. Jim Tsung and Brittany Pardue Jones!
Bacterial pneumonia will manifest as lung consolidation with air bronchograms. The A-line pattern of normal lung will begin to be replaced by B-lines in the area of affected lung:
Here we’ve highlighted the consolidation from the above video as well:
In contrast, subpleural consolidations and confluent B-lines are more suggestive of viral pneumonia.
So what do these look like?
and another example:
occur when multiple B-lines coalesce. In contrast, the next example demonstrates multiple discrete B-lines.
And now for something completely different
Z-Lines: Comet tails that arise from the pleural line but DO NOT make it to the bottom of the ultrasound screen. These are not B-lines. These artifacts have not been associated with any pathology, and they do not obliterate A-lines.
For more details on the sonographic appearance of viral lung pathology, check out this article by Jim Tsung.
Counter-intuitively, when insonating the lungs of healthy patients, we don’t “see” lung tissue. Instead we see and interpret artifacts arising from the pleural lines and the diaphragm. These artifacts change with pulmonary disease processes. In pneumonia, the airway spaces become inspissated with bacterial byproducts and consequently the sonographic appearance of lung tissue changes.
The transformation of lung tissue is termed hepatization: the lung tissue now appears similar to liver tissue.
This can be confusing in the lower lung fields, especially adjacent to the diaphragm because we use the mirror image artifact of the liver and spleen to indicate that lung tissue is normal. This mirrored, artifactual splenic or liver appearance could then be called pseudo-hepatization.
So, how do we differentiate hepatized lung versus pseudo-hepatized lung?
- Never use a single image for your diagnosis, scan through area and convince yourself (then save a representative image or clip for QA).
- Be systematic and scan down from the lung apices to the diaphragm.
- Hunt for the diaphragm and use it as a dividing line between the lung and the abdominal organs.
- Hepatized lung will often have a rim of fluid around it.
Image 1: Normal lung with visible diaphragm
Ultrasound of lung and spleen from Sinai EM Ultrasound on Vimeo.
Image 2: Normal lung with obscured diaphragm
Lung and Spleen Interface on ultrasound from Sinai EM Ultrasound on Vimeo.
Image 3: Hepatized lung at the lower lung field
So we are scanning the left thorax in a patient with shortness of breath, in an effort to assess for pleural effusion. The following video was obtained:
The operator correctly noted the presence of a pleural effusion, and a bit of lung tissue can be seen towards the left side of the screen floating in fluid. In addition, there are THREE shadows evident, each from a different source. Can you spot them?
So let’s take these one at a time, with labels:
Is the easiest one. It extends almost from the first pixel at the top of the screen down to the far field. We can’t even see the characteristic echotexture of skin or subcutaneous tissue in the near field. There’s no contact here between the transducer and skin, possibly due to:
- the probe not touching at all
- clothing or an EKG lead getting in the way
- not enough gel (the novice’s answer to everything but sometimes still true)
The most interesting one of the bunch. Probably two major factors at work here. First, this section of diaphragm is a particularly bright reflector so it can create a shadow behind it due to the sheer amount of reflection occurring. Second, the density difference between the diaphragm and pleural effusion is creating a refraction artifact, often referred to as an edge artifact. Beams of sound which were roughly parallel as they struck this interface get bent at different angles based on whether they hit the dense diaphragm or the less dense fluid. The space in between the formerly tightly spaced beams is displayed as blackness, or the absence of returning echoes.
That’s a rib shadow. Did you know that ribs grow back if you remove them?